COST269
WORKING GROUPS
Membership/Community
Back to : Main /
Working Groups
Minutes
of workshop
Meeting of Paris, 28/04/00
Leopoldina FORTUNATI, Claude HENRY, Samuel MAUCH,
Béatrice Van Pedro GOMEZ could not be with us. He sent a text.
Général
issues
1) Some very large movements in our modern societies have strong
consequences on the items we are working on. We have discussed
about:
-
technology driven society. Engineers, industrialists tightly
connected/oriented with/by financial holders "take the floor"
in our societies
-
accelerated and more and more extended orientation to market,
even on previously public oriented activities.
2) In our general domain, Membership/Community with ICTs, a very
large number of initiatives and experimentations are going-on
through the Europa, on all levels. It would be an exhausted task
to scan all of them. That is not the purpose of a Cost network.
The aim is here to make a scientific screening on the research
activity on this very dynamic domain.
3) Cost 269 is a not so frequent encounter between social scientists
and technician ones . We have to be aware of connection between
ideas and technical support of them (and vice versa!) It is keenly
important in a domain where there is a lot of very general ideas,
and a huge literature on wishes and orientations.
4) Fastly, we came on the necessity of having a good and formalised
concept of the generics of the "User"; Britt is preparing a text
on this point to Stockholm. We would like us to have a connection
with her attempt. On a general view, we can see the user as
-
A person inside the information flow
-
A consumer
-
A person involved with the usability of devices
-
A person seeking for a social and personal utility of her
equipment.
In charge of the our domain, we should have some additional items
to that short list:
Current
orientations of the group:
*** Definition
of the domain, main purposes and bounds ***
Both theoretical orientations:
*On one hand,
we decide to start by a bottom up way, from "significative" experiments
and initiatives, in each of our country; we will analyse them
with two grids of reading:
a) the preconditions
, "premices" of the planification of the chosen experiment (political
ones, administrative, technical, financial, inclusion/exclusion,
implicit system of values…)
b) how are the
users perceived in each experiment or initiative?
We draw up a first list of types of initiatives:
-
E-Europa (promoted by Romano PRODI)
-
National (or regional) action plans on "Information Society
Policy", promoted on government level, with help of all sorts
of expertises.
-
Observatories on ICTs utility and usability,
-
Digital cities and Communities *Counterveiling initiatives
-
Large ICT learning experiments
On the other hand, we take a top down approach:
It is useful to choose some entries in the domain, more theoretical,
to be aware of general issues on what we could build in the future
as well a better understanding (being a possible starting up of
future research projects) as a stronger key of reading of the
experiments and initiatives listed above.
1) Possible transformation (positive
and negative) of the democratic life with ICTs. Real changes or
not in political life (political speech, debates and dialogue
with political "elites", spreading of decision making, power equilibrium
between political levels, new ways of social control…)
2) What about cultural diversity, knowledge
concentration (the more you have access to ICT, the more you are
"quoted" in search engines and portals), easier or not knowledge
management for each person, "cut and paste" culture…
3) ICT and threats on public services,
connection with types of exclusion and inclusion.
4) Transparency, co-regulation of contents,
security and privacy Obviously, the top-down approach will be
connected in a dialectical way with the first bottom-up analysis.
*** To
do in next future ***
The gathering of initiatives and resources
will be in a little bit pragmatic manner at the beginning, done
in each country (five: Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, Swiss),
but open on all the others, with the support of the Cost Committee.
Beatrice try to have a connection with COST A14. Why not an internal
forum between us on Internet?
*** For
Stockholm meeting, we prepare ***
-
A general presentation (Claude)
-
Some light "results" on initiatives
of the first list; E-Europa (Béatrice and Polda), national,
regional or local Action Plan…(all of us)
-
A list of links (to be put up as
hot-links in the Web-site part of our group, starting a sort
of "dissemination" between us!!!).
Notes. Claude circulate
a better copy of the Pedro text. Another meeting in Paris, or
elsewhere! in early October?
|